The Argus is hosting a debate among the judicial candidates tomorrow at Howell High School. 6PM. I believe there's a debate tonight in Fowlerville as well, and one Thursday in Hamburg. I'll try and make at least one of them and post updates.
The Argus has another story on the Drick/Brennan race. I have to take issue with this comment.
Earlier in the campaign, he said his previous literature assailing Brennan's values was just trying to point out that Brennan was appointed, not elected by the people.
Assailing? That's not assailing. Dan Meisler is letting some bias show there. All Drick's campaign literature said referring to Brennan was that it is our choice this election on who picks the judges, not Granholm's.
Lastly, some joker also was defacing Mike Rogers' signs in Brighton Township. That doesn't speaking highly of Marcinkowski's supporters. It's also destruction of property and bigtime illegal. Is that the road you all want to go down. For those who don't want their signs messed with, get some cameras with the license plates down and don't get mad....get even!
10 comments:
Good point Keith. I changed the post a little.
While my Irish temper isn't nearly as volitile as it used to be, destroying property brings it back to its old level rather quickly.
And no, I don't appove of defacing democrat signs either.
I have had 12 of my signs stolen. For the record, I have never touched my opponent's signs and never will.
There is a Dugas (judicial-probate)sign on my street on private property that has been brutally defaced.
I see a LOT of signs on right of ways this year. In some candidates' cases, most signs are in right of ways.
Technically, Right of Way signs may be illegal, and oftentimes municipalities themselves take those down.
I know the City of Howell is well known for taking out right of way signs. I believe Brighton is the same way, as is Marion Twp.
The absolute worst attack and case of Drick assailing Judge Brennan was Drick’s last mailing, where he told the huge lie that she “led and promoted a cut and run anti-troop protest.” I posted that in an earlier post, but I notice dan was very quite about it. It’s hard to defend an outrageous lie. On the other hand, the saying goes if you’re going to tell a lie, it might as well be a whopper, and you took that advice to heart.
As for signs, it happens every year, and to say one party does it more than another is pure BS. Plus, if there are so few Democrats in this county they can’t be doing much damage. Try looking at the actual opponent for the Aug. 8 primary.
You have crossed the line big time Dan. Why would a Democrat have anything to do with the destruction of a Rogers sign? It's your right wing nuts who are to the right of Rogers.
You know this to be true and yet you shamelessly tell this whopper of a lie as if it were true.
I am sorry I don't know how you can live with yourself after that one!
Well Mr. Communist I didn’t know how Kevins could have “egg on his face” because you have never beat him in a debate. Too bad he got kicked off the blog. As for me, the same thing applies. Your argument here is to resort to name calling instead of addressing the facts, just like you do again and again and again.
Well, there you go again. I just pointed out in the last post that instead of trying to dispute my arguments with facts you resort to name calling, and Mr. Communist does it again in this post. I’m not a debater, but I’m a good, persuasive writer. You have not disproved anything I have written about.
Well, Mr. Communist, I didn’t see the Fowlerville debate, but Judge Brennan stood head and shoulders above the rest in the debate last night at Howell.
Justmyopinins
“You dirty democrats beware!” Nice, very classy.
You are right, “The facts about the war protest are in black and white and undeniable (sic).” Yet, Mr. Drick and dan keep lying about it. How am I putting my “foot in my mouth.”? I never denied that Judge Brennan helped a friend get the permit to hold an anti-war protest in 2003. But, again, it was before the war began, and remember bush was lying to us by saying war was a last resort, and the protester believed it, saying just give the weapons inspectors more time to find the WMDs. For Drick to call it a “Cut-and-run anti-troop protest” is an outrageous lie. Not a misstatement, stretching the truth or even a white lie. It’s a lie.
Now, How am I making “a bigger fool of (myself) with every name calling denial of black and white facts?” Hell, who did I even call a name?
Again, all class. If you say Democrats stole your signs, fine.
Again, Judge Brennan, before she was a judge, helped a friend from the Michigan Peace Network get a permit in March of 2003. I guess the war was inevitable, but no one but bush’s inner circle knew that then. We took him at his word when he said war was a lost option. Silly us. If she did plan it, great. That is a positive for her. She was right, there were no WMDs. Just think of all the lives that would have been saved if the President had listened. But he knew shortly after he the Supreme Court decision he was going to invade.
I have no idea what protest your talking about that Chris Nagy wrote about. No my head was not in the sand, but either apparently yours was or you just like making things up.
Yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying.
There were “numerous WMDs found.” Enough said, no use arguing with someone who believes that whopper. Even the bushies have enough sense not to say that. Yes, 200 did show up at an anti-war protest. That’s one I was talking about. I was there, and like I said for the third time, it was a protest before the war started to get bush to do what he actually said he was going to do.
Post a Comment