On the dem side, Schertzing was recruited by the dem establishment. They wanted Whitmer or Byrum, but both declined. The other three candidates for them are sacrificial lambs.
MI-08 Update - 2013
The 2011 Update is here.
The 2009 Update is here.
Incumbent – Open with Mike Rogers retirement
Years in office as of 2014 election – 14
Challengers – Bryan Barnett (R-Rochester Hills), Mike Bishop (R-Rochester), Tom McMillin (R-Rochester Hills) Ken Darga (D-Lansing), Susan Grettenberger (D-Lansing), Jeffrey Hank (D-East Lansing), Eric Schertzing (D-East Lansing)
Years in office as of 2014 election – 14
Challengers – Bryan Barnett (R-Rochester Hills), Mike Bishop (R-Rochester), Tom McMillin (R-Rochester Hills) Ken Darga (D-Lansing), Susan Grettenberger (D-Lansing), Jeffrey Hank (D-East Lansing), Eric Schertzing (D-East Lansing)
2012:
Mike Rogers – 202217 – 58.60%
Lance Enderle – 128657
– 37.29%
73560 vote difference
Romney – 183240 votes – 51.10%
Obama – 171684 votes – 47.87%
11556 vote difference.
2008: (Approx)
McCain – 176239 votes – 46.38%
Obama – 197572 votes – 51.97%
-21243 vote difference
2004: (approx)
Bush – 195830 votes – 54.28%
Kerry –161383 votes – 44.73%
34447 vote difference
Note - Rochester
Hills renamed precincts between 08 and 12 so I’m estimating 04 and 08.
This district is a swing district that is a battle of the
strongholds. It combines the 4th most democrat county in the state
with the 3rd or 4th most republican county in the state
and some of the most republican part of Oakland County.
The keys here are to win your areas big and reduce the margins in the other
base. It’s a Captain Obvious statement, but it is easier said than done. Base
problems here can destroy your chances, as can alienating the swing voters.
Mike Rogers does a good job at striking that balance. He’s
actually won Ingham County in the past, even once winning Lansing itself. He also
runs ahead of everyone in Livingston
County.
For the map, I’ll use the same color code, staying with the
Dark Blue for 70% d areas that I used in Districts 5, 6, and 7
70%+Dem – Dark Blue
60%-69.99% - Blue
55%-59.99% - Slate Blue
50%-54.99% - Light Sky Blue
Less than 50% - Gold
R wins:
70%+Rep – Firebrick
60-69.99% - Red
55-59.99% - Orange Red
50-54.99% - Salmon
Less than 50% - Yellow
Tie – Spring Green
2012:
2008:
2004:
Ingham County is usually the 4th most democrat
county in the state behind Genesee, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties in that
order. Kerry won it with 57.78% and by 22143 votes. Obama in 08 with 65.86% and
47511 votes, and Obama in 2012 with 63.43% and 35541 votes. In 2004, Ingham was 36.88% of the district
vote. In 08, it was 37.54% of the vote. In 2012, it was 35.54% of the vote. Key base areas for the dems here are Lansing,
Lansing Township, East Lansing, and Meridian Township (Okemos and Haslett) Lansing
and Meridian Township alone make up about ½ of the county voters. Lansing is a
mix of UAW, government related workers, minorities, and college students (MSU,
Cooley, LCC). Lansing Township has historically been more auto-related in one
part, and MSU related on the other. East Lansing is MSU and also government
workers commuting to Lansing. It is usually the most democrat part of the
district, although Lansing was this election. Meridian Township to the east of
East Lansing is where a lot of MSU professors life, as do some students. The
vote deficits we had to make up with those four places alone are as follows - 35839
in 2012, 45528 in 2008, and 27047 in 2004. That’s not easy to do.
There’s four swing areas in this county that are key. Delhi
Twp (Holt), Mason, Leslie, and Williamston.
They are all areas with a lot of Lansing commuters and can be won by
either side. Bush won them all in 04. Obama won them all twice. In an open seat for this district – if the R’s
win all of them, this district is safe. If all of them are lost, it’s going to
be a nervous night. The Southern and Eastern outer portions of the county often
lean R, but not always. The Byrums are from Onondaga, own a store in
Stockbridge, and run ahead of the ticket. That area is independent, and a bad
showing there (like 08) makes things very scary district wide. If we keep the dems under 60%, we have the
district. If we keep them under 57%, we have
good chance winning statewide.
East of there is my home. Livingston County. This county is highly educated, strongly conservative,
pro-business, and is distrustful of big city politics. Being an hour or less
from Detroit, Flint, Lansing, or Ann Arbor, that’s to be expected. By
Oakland County or Ann Arbor standards,
this is “past civilization.” We like it that way. There’s a strong 2nd
Amendment , tea party, libertarian, and pro-life movement here, but there are
also more pro-choice republicans than one would expect in a county where RTL is
very strong. This area wasn’t as social conservative in the 90’s. The MEA is
also fairly strong here considering how Republican this county is. The magic
number for us percentage wise is about 63%. If we break 63%, we have a good
chance of winning statewide. If we’re under 60%, it’s going to be bad. Mike
Rogers always runs extremely well here. In bad years or bad candidates, R’s are
sometimes held to 53-55%. McCain was held to 55.79%. In 04, Livingston’s 62.90%
and 24969 vote spread was able to counterpunch Ingham County on its own. 08 was
a whooping. McCain barely made a dent in Ingham’s vote spread. 2012 was a
recovery of sorts as Romney set the highwater mark for raw votes and got the percentage
up to 61.10%. That’s better than Bush 2000 and McCain. That still isn’t good
enough. It made a good dent in Ingham’s spread, but not enough. There’s no real
dem base here enough to cause a threat without special circumstances. Candidate
quality is always key and can change things, but generic R always smashes
generic D here 60-40 in normal November elections. Dems have some strength in
nonpartisan races here, and are strong in small pockets of the county (a
handful of precincts they sometime win). Usually it’s either places with
apartment complexes and/or where a lot of teachers live. The MEA is the base of
the dems in these parts. In our worst years, Brighton, Howell, Putnam Twp,
Unadilla Twp, and maybe Hamburg Twp can flip narrowly. Usually they are around
the 54/55% R range. In good years, those same areas can go for close to 60% R Most of the county is blood red, less so in
the incorporated cities, and less so near the Washtenaw County line. Down the
road, who knows? Nobody saw Oakland County going for democrats back in 1984.
Livingston County is still growing, and it is our job to educate new residents why
this is a great place to live, and part of that is due to our longtime local
conservative and republican leadership. Do we have threats on the horizon?
Absolutely. Novi’s six miles from the county line and used to be as Republican
as we are. Now it’s 50/50. I’m not taking anything for granted.
East of here is Oakland County. While Oakland is purplish to
blue overall, this part of Oakland County is not much different than Livingston
County in its voting behavior. Holly is competitive, but that’s about it. A lot
of these areas vote about 60%R. Rochester and Rochester Hills are causes for
concern with migration however. Independence Township is blood red and a base
area. Most of this area is base republican and some of it is even rural which
isn’t what one expects in Oakland County. This is much of the R base in Oakland
County. This is mainstream conservative country, much like Livingston County.
Overall this district is largely heavily blue or red. There
isn’t a lot of in-between. Mike Rogers wins big because he keeps his base,
racks up large margins in Livingston and North Oakland, and does respectable
(sometimes winning) in Ingham County. He even won Meridian Township last
election, along with all the swing areas like Delhi Twp and Mason. That’s the
blueprint for making this a “safe” district for an incumbent. Is there a way
the dems can take this district? Yes. Holding the R’s to 55% in Livingston and
54% in Oakland, while racking up big margins in Ingham County as in 2008 will
do that. Could that happen again? Yes, with poor candidate quality. That’s our
challenge if Mike Rogers runs for Senate.
District 8 | Romney | Obama | Total | Diff | GOP | DEM |
Ingham County | ||||||
Alaiedon Twp | 954 | 837 | 1818 | 117 | 52.48% | 46.04% |
Aurelius Twp | 1192 | 980 | 2199 | 212 | 54.21% | 44.57% |
Bunker Hill Twp | 498 | 445 | 952 | 53 | 52.31% | 46.74% |
Delhi Twp | 5916 | 7364 | 13419 | -1448 | 44.09% | 54.88% |
East Lansing | 4560 | 11764 | 16487 | -7204 | 27.66% | 71.35% |
Ingham Twp | 720 | 510 | 1250 | 210 | 57.60% | 40.80% |
Lansing | 11087 | 33661 | 45253 | -22574 | 24.50% | 74.38% |
Lansing Twp | 1260 | 2606 | 3918 | -1346 | 32.16% | 66.51% |
Leroy Twp | 999 | 735 | 1749 | 264 | 57.12% | 42.02% |
Leslie | 351 | 391 | 755 | -40 | 46.49% | 51.79% |
Leslie Twp | 677 | 550 | 1244 | 127 | 54.42% | 44.21% |
Locke Twp | 589 | 425 | 1026 | 164 | 57.41% | 41.42% |
Mason | 1806 | 2057 | 3895 | -251 | 46.37% | 52.81% |
Meridian Twp | 8262 | 12977 | 21402 | -4715 | 38.60% | 60.63% |
Onondaga Twp | 735 | 706 | 1460 | 29 | 50.34% | 48.36% |
Stockbridge Twp | 970 | 777 | 1772 | 193 | 54.74% | 43.85% |
Vevay Twp | 1097 | 863 | 1975 | 234 | 55.54% | 43.70% |
Wheatfield Twp | 587 | 429 | 1026 | 158 | 57.21% | 41.81% |
White Oak Twp | 339 | 242 | 588 | 97 | 57.65% | 41.16% |
Williamston | 987 | 1003 | 2010 | -16 | 49.10% | 49.90% |
Williamstown Twp | 1720 | 1525 | 3265 | 195 | 52.68% | 46.71% |
Total | 45306 | 80847 | 127463 | -35541 | 35.54% | 63.43% |
Livingston County | ||||||
Brighton | 2201 | 1828 | 4065 | 373 | 54.15% | 44.97% |
Brighton Twp | 6964 | 3833 | 10903 | 3131 | 63.87% | 35.16% |
Cohoctah Twp | 1042 | 539 | 1593 | 503 | 65.41% | 33.84% |
Conway Twp | 1059 | 593 | 1671 | 466 | 63.38% | 35.49% |
Deerfield Twp | 1417 | 797 | 2242 | 620 | 63.20% | 35.55% |
Genoa Twp | 7186 | 3925 | 11224 | 3261 | 64.02% | 34.97% |
Green Oak Twp | 6037 | 3888 | 10020 | 2149 | 60.25% | 38.80% |
Hamburg Twp | 6918 | 5153 | 12185 | 1765 | 56.77% | 42.29% |
Handy Twp | 2058 | 1425 | 3524 | 633 | 58.40% | 40.44% |
Hartland Twp | 5143 | 2656 | 7880 | 2487 | 65.27% | 33.71% |
Howell | 2249 | 1753 | 4079 | 496 | 55.14% | 42.98% |
Howell Twp | 2146 | 1330 | 3520 | 816 | 60.97% | 37.78% |
Iosco Twp | 1169 | 627 | 1818 | 542 | 64.30% | 34.49% |
Marion Twp | 3620 | 1970 | 5635 | 1650 | 64.24% | 34.96% |
Oceola Twp | 4108 | 2212 | 6389 | 1896 | 64.30% | 34.62% |
Putnam Twp | 2369 | 1933 | 4353 | 436 | 54.42% | 44.41% |
Tyrone Twp | 3496 | 2044 | 5602 | 1452 | 62.41% | 36.49% |
Unadilla Twp | 901 | 710 | 1634 | 191 | 55.14% | 43.45% |
Total | 60083 | 37216 | 98337 | 22867 | 61.10% | 37.85% |
Oakland County (pt) | ||||||
Addison Twp | 2302 | 1215 | 3564 | 1087 | 64.59% | 34.09% |
Brandon Twp | 4552 | 3213 | 7850 | 1339 | 57.99% | 40.93% |
Clarkston | 329 | 261 | 595 | 68 | 55.29% | 43.87% |
Groveland Twp | 1864 | 1117 | 3007 | 747 | 61.99% | 37.15% |
Holly Twp | 2752 | 2604 | 5433 | 148 | 50.65% | 47.93% |
Independence Twp | 11841 | 7428 | 19484 | 4413 | 60.77% | 38.12% |
Oakland Twp | 6663 | 3317 | 10051 | 3346 | 66.29% | 33.00% |
Orion Twp | 11009 | 7644 | 18889 | 3365 | 58.28% | 40.47% |
Oxford Twp | 6274 | 4058 | 10443 | 2216 | 60.08% | 38.86% |
Rochester | 3930 | 3019 | 7015 | 911 | 56.02% | 43.04% |
Rochester Hills 1-8 | 509 | 301 | 815 | 208 | 62.45% | 36.93% |
Rochester Hills 1-14 | 986 | 675 | 1641 | 311 | 60.09% | 41.13% |
Rochester Hills 1-17 | 984 | 756 | 1752 | 228 | 56.16% | 43.15% |
RH 1-22 | 583 | 440 | 1033 | 143 | 56.44% | 42.59% |
RH 1-23 | 509 | 479 | 994 | 30 | 51.21% | 48.19% |
RH 1-26 | 1253 | 724 | 1981 | 529 | 63.25% | 36.55% |
RH 1-29 | 489 | 308 | 800 | 181 | 61.13% | 38.50% |
RH 2-4 | 475 | 478 | 961 | -3 | 49.43% | 49.74% |
RH 2-7 | 465 | 386 | 856 | 79 | 54.32% | 45.09% |
RH 2-9 | 1028 | 754 | 1797 | 274 | 57.21% | 41.96% |
RH 2-10 | 661 | 526 | 1194 | 135 | 55.36% | 44.05% |
RH 2-18 | 704 | 422 | 1146 | 282 | 61.43% | 36.82% |
RH 2-19 | 696 | 414 | 1118 | 282 | 62.25% | 37.03% |
RH 2-21 | 835 | 458 | 1303 | 377 | 64.08% | 35.15% |
RH 2-25 | 1060 | 619 | 1690 | 441 | 62.72% | 36.63% |
RH 2-32 | 670 | 561 | 1241 | 109 | 53.99% | 45.21% |
RH 3-1 | 791 | 681 | 1493 | 110 | 52.98% | 45.61% |
RH 3-12 | 866 | 658 | 1537 | 208 | 56.34% | 42.81% |
RH 3-16 | 787 | 670 | 1473 | 117 | 53.43% | 45.49% |
RH 3-24 | 673 | 552 | 1229 | 121 | 54.76% | 44.91% |
RH 3-31 | 489 | 448 | 943 | 41 | 51.86% | 47.51% |
RH 4-5 | 720 | 635 | 1371 | 85 | 52.52% | 46.32% |
RH 4-11 | 443 | 550 | 1007 | -107 | 43.99% | 54.62% |
RH 4-15 | 373 | 479 | 864 | -106 | 43.17% | 55.44% |
RH 4-20 | 415 | 420 | 838 | -5 | 49.52% | 50.12% |
RH 4-27 | 615 | 550 | 1174 | 65 | 52.39% | 46.85% |
RH 4-28 | 548 | 800 | 1361 | -252 | 40.26% | 58.78% |
RH 4-30 | 759 | 782 | 1553 | -23 | 48.87% | 50.35% |
Rose Twp | 2024 | 1441 | 3517 | 583 | 57.55% | 40.97% |
Springfield Twp | 4925 | 2778 | 7809 | 2147 | 63.07% | 35.57% |
Total | 77851 | 53621 | 132822 | 24230 | 58.61% | 40.37% |
Total All | 183240 | 171684 | 358622 | 11556 | 51.10% | 47.87% |
1 comment:
Great blog. All posts have something to learn. Your work is very good and i appreciate you and hopping for some more informative posts. Settle IRS Tax Debt
Post a Comment