Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Barack Hussein Obama breaks his word and runs for president

Barack Osama, I mean Obama is in for 2008.

The media's golden boy said he wasn't going to run - and boom! He's now in. Now can someone explain why this guy is so popular with the media and is considered presidential material? I can answer that. Superficial hype machine. He's the 2004 version of John Edwards.

This guy would be just another two bit senator if he was white. He'd be just another two bit senator if he was a Carol Mosely Braun (inner city) clone. Because he's a black man who talks and culturally acts "white", the guilty white liberals (Who sent Mosely Braun home in 1998 for the same reason Coleman Young was hated in Oakland County) can all support him so they can be "cool" and tell their latte drinking friend how "tolerant" they are and their support of "diversity". They are driving his hype machine. That's not the most PC thing to say, but it's the truth. Obama is he's fair game here, just like Granholm, Stabenow, Kennedy, Hanoi John Kerry, Hillary, Waxman, Schumer and all the white leftists.

Why the John Edwards reference? The hype machine. Edwards would have been just another two bit junior senator if he was from the North and not the South. The democrats ran him in order to contest the South after only ONE term. Although there IS one difference between the two. At least Edwards is less afraid of expressing where he stands on the issues this year. Obama is all platitudes so far. With his voting record, I can't blame the guy.

Barack Obama has ten years of political experience, all of them as a backbencher. He spent eight years as a State Senator and has served two years as US Senator easily beating Alan Keyes, a carpetbagging Marylander who moved to Illinois to replace candidate Jack Ryan was caught in a minor scandal. He's lost one election, to Bobby Rush in a 2000 primary due to "not being in the district long enough to see what is really going on." After that, he bid his time until Peter Fitzgerald retired in 2004 and took the open seat in a tough democrat primary before defeating Keyes. Is a 8 year state senator with two years of US senate experience and no executive experience enough to be president?

Now, here's his voting record - which is my major problem with this joker.

On Taxes - He voted against making permanent the repeal of the state's 5 percent sales tax on gasoline. (2000) Way to be for the "workin' man" Obama.

On Abortion - He voted against restrictions on public funding of abortion. (2000) Not only is Barack Obama pro-abortion, he wants us to pay for it.

And then, there's the 2nd amendment. Like most Chicago politicians like Boss Daley and Rod Blagojevich, Obama spits on the Constitution with these votes.

"Voted against letting people argue self-defense in court if charged with violating local weapons bans by using a gun in their home. (2004)"

This should be broadcasted to every single home in the country.

""Voted to let retired police and military police carry concealed weapons. (2004) ""

Now this shows that he supports a caste system. Government can carry firearms, but us little people can't. That's the mentality of the anti-constitution crowd. This STALINIST must be defeated.

""Unsuccessfully sponsored limit of one handgun purchase per month. (2000)""

Another anti-freedom measure. That's a lot in only eight years.

He also voted to ban .30-30 and all centerfire ammunition as a US senator. He is also on the Joyce Foundation's board of directors. They fund organizations that support total bans on firearms. Most gun grabber work starts from that organization.

It's time to send this anti-freedom leftist back to Boss Daley land. We don't need Chicago's statism nationwide. He'll get no special breaks from here.

15 comments:

Communications guru said...

A lot of class with the Osama crack, but what can I expect from someone who is classless. Besides, the president could care less about Osama. He only conspired to kill 3,000 people in the WTC, and, after all, Osama, was bush’s cover to invade Iraq.

Hey dan, you’re sheet and hood are showing.

Barack has more experience than the guy in the WH now, and Barack is a whole lot more intelligent. Its funny you’re running down Keyes. His wing nut views should mirror yours. I’m sure you were front row center when he spoke at the RTL dinner. I was there, and I was shocked that this guy was actually an ambassador once.

Your “major problem with him” is he’s a Democrat.

Republican Michigander said...

Ah, it's short fuse and bigmouth Kevin S. You get all PO'ed after being called a "pussy", and then you run your mouth with this BS about me wearing a sheet and hood. Never mind the fact that I'm one of the minorities that the Klucksters don't like very much.

As far as Keyes goes, he's a good speaker. He wasn't a good senate candidate, especially in a state he doesn't live in. That's just a fact.

My whole attack was on guilty white liberals backing him so they feel good about themselves. Personally, I don't give a rat's rear end about Obama's color, although I want to take out his spin machine and hype given by the limosine leftists and yuppie crowd - your kind of people.

My major problem with Obama is that he wipes his rear end with the Constitution with his gun grabbing. If some homeowner in Chicago defends himself with a firearm, he's going to jail since guns are banned there. Obama supports that along with his puppeteer Mayor Daley. He wants Americans defenseless, like Osama.

liberals Hate America said...

Guru, are you serious that Bush was in some way responsible for 9-11. You are dumber that I thought, what an A-hole. I suppose that the building was blow up too.

On Sen. Barack Obama and A live born fetus.

Legislation was presented on the federal level and in various states called the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. It stated all live-born babies were guaranteed the same constitutional right to equal protection, whether or not they were wanted.
BAIPA sailed through the U.S. Senate by unanimous vote. Even Senators, Clinton, Kennedy and Kerry agreed a mother's right to "choose" stopped at her baby's delivery.
The bill also passed overwhelmingly in the House. NARAL-Pro Choice America, went neutral on it. Abortion enthusiasts publicly agreed that fighting BAIPA would appear extreme. President Bush signed BAIPA into law in 2002.
But in Illinois, the state version of BAIPA repeatedly failed, thanks in large part to then-state Sen. Barack Obama. It only passed in 2005, after Obama left.
Obama articulately worried that legislation protecting live aborted babies might infringe on women's rights or abortionists' rights. Obama's clinical discourse, his lack of mercy, shocked me. Obama voted against the measure, twice. It ultimately failed.
In 2003, as chairman of the next Senate committee to which BAIPA was sent, Obama stopped it from even getting a hearing, shelving it to die much like babies were still being shelved to die in Illinois hospitals and abortion clinics.
(As chair of that same committee, Obama once abruptly ended a hearing early, right before Scott and Janet Willis, the parents of six children killed as a result of Illinois' drivers licenses for bribes scandal, were to testify in favor of Choose Life license plate legislation. He later killed the bill when no one was around.)
Here is what Obama said when arguing against Illinois' Born Alive Infants Protection Act during Senate floor debate. This was legislation clarifying the terms "person," "human being," "child," and "individual" in Illinois statutes included any baby born alive, no matter what gestational age or circumstance of birth:
… I just want to suggest… that this is probably not going to survive constitutional scrutiny.
Number one, whenever we define a pre-viable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we're really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a – child, a 9-month-old – child that was delivered to term. That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place.
I mean, it – it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute. For that purpose, I think it would probably be found unconstitutional.
Incredible stuff. Not only did Obama make no sense, he showed just how far he would go to safeguard abortion.
First, Obama contended age is a determining factor whether constitutional rights apply.
Second, Obama reverse-argued that late-term abortions are already unconstitutional if those babies survive. By claiming a "child that was delivered to term" already had constitutional "protections," but giving those same protections to a child delivered before term would "forbid abortions" of the younger child, Obama was asserting abortion of the older child is already forbidden.
(It would seem Obama intentionally misrepresented this point to his colleagues, since he previously sponsored partial-birth abortion legislation with a health loophole against partial-birth abortion legislation without one. Obama certainly knows abortion is legal throughout all nine months of pregnancy up to and throughout the delivery process for almost any reason.)
Three, even if a pre-viable baby survives an abortion, the pregnancy has been terminated. The mother got what she wanted. What more does Obama need, a dead baby? Yes.
Last, Obama's word choices condemned him: "… because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child"? Only if a child is not defined a child can we "allow somebody to kill" her? Obama instinctively knows abortion kills.
Some Catholics use the term "seamless garment" to express their belief that all human life must be protected, from conception to natural death.
Obama's term would be the "seamless abortion garment" to express his belief that all human life must be killed if abortion is intended, from conception to some as yet unpinpointed time after birth.
When is that point, senator?

Communications guru said...

You’re dam right I was pissed off abut those comments, and I had every right to be. They were uncalled for, and they were lies. Sorry, the rant was racist. You need to look past his color. And what minority are you?

You went a whole lot farther in running down Keys to make Barack look bad than “He wasn't a good senate candidate, especially in a state he doesn't live in.”

Calling me a “limousine leftists” is ridiculous. I’m not a Communist, and I drive a 1996 Oldsmobile and I’m just trying to pay my mortgage every month.

Where the hell in the Constitution does it guarantee armor piercing ammo? That’s one of the most ridiculous things you have ever said, and there have been a lot of them.

As for hate America, I never said bush was responsible for 9/11. I said he could care less about the man who was responsible for it, and he has used 9/11 as cover for just about everything he has done. Bush was only the president when 9/11 occurred. Again, I never said he was responsible for 9/11. I didn't bother to read the rest of your long-winded rant.

BigShot said...

I agree, (wow this is gonna feel weird), with Mr. Guru when he refrences the Osama joke. No matter how much you disagree with the person politically you dont trash there name. But the agreeing stops there.

NO PRESIDENT WOULD EVER PLOT TO KILL 3000 AMERICANS!!!! I am speechless that you can even say that, no that any one can say that. This just goes to show us how the liberals are ruining America.

Communications guru said...

Where did I ever say the President plotted to kill 3,000 people? I have have never, nor would I ever, say anything so stupid.
Liberals are doing the exact opposite. It’s liberals who have made America great and fostered progress. You obviously don’t agree with that, but to say liberals are ruining America is just plain wrong and stupid. It’s as stupid as say conservatives are ruining America.

Republican Michigander said...

""You’re dam right I was pissed off abut those comments, and I had every right to be. They were uncalled for, and they were lies."""

Just like your Argus hitpiece on gun owners as a columnists.

""Sorry, the rant was racist. You need to look past his color. And what minority are you?""

I was attacking the guilty white liberal and Obama's hype machine, and the oh so tolerant latte leftists with this Obamamania trying to create another JFK. It's also a valid question. Would Obama be anything more than a two bit backbenching senator if he was either white or culturally inner city? Nope. He'd be no different than Dick Durbin. For that matter would Hillary be anything more than a backbencher if she didn't marry Bill? Nope. She's less qualified than even Obama. Would Edwards be more of a candidate than Chris Dodd if he was a Yankee?

Contrasting that with either Doug Wilder or Bill Richardson if they run. Wilder had executive experience as a governor and mayor, winning in a tough state and in a tough general election. Richardson would be the most experienced of all the democrats. Either of them wouldn't be "token" candidates.

And last I checked, the Klan didn't like Catholics very much.

""You went a whole lot farther in running down Keys to make Barack look bad than “He wasn't a good senate candidate, especially in a state he doesn't live in.”"""

The only thing I called Keyes was a carpetbagger. The scandal was Jack Ryan's.

"""Where the hell in the Constitution does it guarantee armor piercing ammo? That’s one of the most ridiculous things you have ever said, and there have been a lot of them."""

All centerfire ammunition is "armor piercing" according to Ted Kennedy. The Amendment is the Second Amendment, part of the Constitution. You should know about it if you were in the military, as you swore an oath to it. The same oath you break when you turn your back on the Constitution. Obama took that same oath and turned his back on it as well when he became a senator. He'll pay for it too once his extremist guns for government, not for peons record is shown.

Communications guru said...

Every thing in that, what six-year-old, column was correct, accurate, factual and fit for a family newspaper. I don’t even remember what was in it, but I have never written a “hit piece.”

You obviously cannot look past his color, and again, he has more experience than GWB. What the hell is a “latte leftists?” What the hell is “culturally inner city?” Would GWB be anything more than a failed businessman if he were not the President’s son or a Senators grandson?

Oh yes, you are so persecuted because you go to catechism. Give me a break. The Klan was formed to keep uppity Catholics down. How ridiculous.

“""You went a whole lot farther in running down Keys to make Baracka look bad than “He wasn't a good senate candidate, especially in a state he doesn't live in.”"""

I don’t give a rat’s ass if center fire ammunition is "armor piercing" or it is not armor piercing.” The kind of rounds a weapons fires has absolutely nothing to do with the Constitution or the 2nd Amendment. I did swear an oath to defend the Constitution, and I am defending it now. I have never turned my back on the Constitution, nor has the Senator turned his back on it. Holding a different viewpoint than another person certainly does not mean you don’t uphold the Constitution, and for someone to say that is just an insecure idiot.

The intent of the 2nd Amendment was to ensure militias would not be disarmed not necessarily to allow every Tom, Dick and dan to keep a Saturday night special. But stretching it to somehow mean you can’t ban a certain kind of ammo is utterly ridiculous. So is calling me a “gungrabber.” I don’t want your gun, and I’m OK with the current gun laws.

Republican Michigander said...

The column was extremely inaccurate, and typical of the lies and spin you write. Just like your lie about you being kicked off this blog.

No, Obama does not have more experience than W. W was a governor and chief executive of the 2nd largest state in the country. That's much more experience than 2 years as a Washington backbencher and 8 years as a Springfield backbencher. And as for his color, I was taking a shot at the hype machine of a two bit junior senator that you people in the leftist media keep calling a "rock star". Latte leftists are those who control the democrat party. Rich leftists like George Soros, Warren Buffet, and Ted Kennedy.

I never said I was persecuted. Don't put words in my mouth. I know you leftist media people like to do that. I said the Klan didn't like us very much. They didn't like much of anyone. Blacks, Jews, Catholics. They were also gun grabbers so "those people" couldn't defend themselves, so you have something in common with them.

Again, that's ALL centerfire rifle ammo that would have been banned. Basicaly, a back door way to ban all rifles. And disarming the people is a blatent violation of the Constitution which you don't support (and you call yourself a veteran - you certainly did not defend the constitution). And who is the militia? The common citizenry. Read the federalist and anti-federalist papers and become educated.

Steve Rankin said...

communications guru: You wrote above that GW Bush "conspired to kill 3000 people in the WTC..." Do you really believe that, you paranoid socialist?

You must have flunked out of spelling class, CG.

BTW: The former Illinois senator's name is actually Carol MEASLEY BRAIN.

Communications guru said...

Sorry, dan, the column written six years ago was accurate, correct and true. If not, you’re going to have to prove it’s anything but accurate. I don’t write lies, and if I did why can’t you disprove any of these alleged lies? Sorry again, I was kicked off. Show me where I can still post as Kevins without registering as a blogger?

Sorry, Barack has more experience than GWB. You certainly can make the argument, and you try, that his experience does not equal shrub’s, but the fact remains Barack has more experience.

Again, I am not a Communist, so stop with the “leftist BS. I’m also not “you people in the leftist media,” and the media is conservative. And working people control the Democratic Party.

You certainly said you were persecuted. You tried to imply that you couldn’t be a racist despite your racist rant because you were a minority. I’m not a “gun grabber,” and saying the klan are is just as ridiculous. You have a lot more in commons with the Klan because you are a racist.

Ammo is not guaranteed under the 2nd Amendment, and no matter how you try it’s still not the case. I do support the Constitution, and I spent 20 years in the military defending it. So much for your bullshit that you support the troops. Apparently only if they agree with your extreme views. You’re dam right I call myself a veteran.

Correct, the militia is the common citizenry, but that was before there was a standing army when every citizen was armed to defend the country in an emergency. If you want to be part of the militia and carry a gun I suggest you enlist or get a commission.

The names don’t help you argument, steve, but I’m used to it from people like you. No, I did not write, “that GW Bush "conspired to kill 3000 people in the WTC.” I wrote, “Besides, the president could care less about Osama. He only conspired to kill 3,000 people in the WTC, and, after all, Osama, was bush’s cover to invade Iraq.” The "he" is Osama, not shrub.

No, I did not flunk out of spelling class; typing class, yes. You and your superior intellect are going to have to point out the misspellings or typos.

BigShot said...

Mr. Guru,

I believe that you made a mistake when you said the following; "Besides, the president could care less about Osama. He only conspired to kill 3,000 people in the WTC, and, after all, Osama, was bush’s cover to invade Iraq.". To me is sounded like you were saying the President plotted to kill 3000 people.

Come on guys, you are giving Guru no chance to say what he believes. On my blog, defendthegop.blogspot.com, any one can say what they want, so long as there is no profanity. I don't agree with Guru, but I still let him say what he wants. I am just saying, (and this applies to me), lets try to be decent and intelligent and have a good clean debate with no name calling.

Republican Michigander said...

I could give a rat's rear end what Obama's skin color is. However, he's fair game, just like all the other leftists. I'm an equal opportunity exposer of leftism and their hype machines. Whites, blacks, greens, blues, and even Irish Catholics are all fair game here. When it comes to leftists, "all are equally worthless"

Kevins, stop lying. I never said I was persecuted, and I never kicked you off this blog. You get all in a snit when Matt called you a "pussy" and demanded that he apologies for his alledged lies. Pot, meet kettle.

Republican Michigander said...

Bigshot - Kevin can say whatever he feels like here as long as he doesn't use unacceptable language (and I usually leave the mild stuff alone).

It doesn't mean I won't respond to his lies, but he can have his say.

Communications guru said...

I always have my say no matter how hard they try and stop me, or how vicious the personal attacks get. I will say what I feel like because it’s the truth. Dan has never been able to disprove anything I have written, but then he still has the nerve to call them lies. What a joke.

You do give a “rat’s ass what his skin color is because your post demonstrates you are a racist. Again, kevins was kicked off this blog because I cannot post here like I did before you kicked me off.

It’s funny. I posted comments on a post where bigshot was demanding an apology from Sen. Boxer for something he thinks he heard, but it’s OK for Matt to call me those names – and it was much worse than just pussy: you know that – unsolicited, and no one thinks he should apologize.

That’s called a double standard.

If I was debating someone, and they called me some unpleasant names that does not bother me because I have endured countless personal attacks on this blog. But when someone unleashes that kind of offensive attack it’s over the top. It’s no pot meeting kettle, and if it is show me. You’re rant was racist. Pure and simple, and I’ve certainly not called you anything worse than you have called me. I have never attacked your profession or your professional integrity. And clearly the names were lies.