Jay's website is up, and I encourage everyone to take a look at it.
Jay's a strict constitutionalist, and that is my number one reason for supporting him. The other major reasons are experience and judicial temperment. In the case of judicial temperment, I've never seen Jay lose his cool in any situation. He's always stayed calm, and that is needed in a judge.
Sunday, May 07, 2006
Jay Drick for District Judge
It's time to Pick Jay Drick for District Judge.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
In this group, Brennan has the experience. She too is always calm and proven! It's great to have a woman on the bench.
The definition of a strict constitutionalist in my mind means one who will use our constitution to make judicial decisions instead of legislating from the bench.
This has nothing to do with whatever meetings anyone attends or doestn't attend.
Jay knows the law well,and will apply it fairly.
What does legislating from the bench actually mean to you?
Brennen has what experience exactly? She ran for the bench and was soundly rejected. She was then appointed for her strong left wing, democratic activism by Granholm. Hardly the experience we need on the bench.
Drick is dedicated to the law. Brennan to granholm. Lets pick a real judge.
I simply defined it as I interpreted it.
The fact is that Jay knows the law and will apply it fairly. He will make a great judge.
No "code" implied.
It serves no one's interest to have a judge appointed for us because she is your "buddy". We don't want another pretty face, we NEED someone who knows the law, interprets the law, and applies the law. Jay Drick has the experience, the integrity, the temperment, and the trust for this job. We'll elect Jay Drick.
Brennan imposes vindictive sentences and penalizes defendants for invoking their rights to jury trial. She also expresses judicial bias by disallowing comments by attorneys that she does not like personally. She has also had a complaint filed against her for judicial impropriety regarding comments she made in open court regarding drinking alcoholic beverages in front of a defendant.
Post a Comment